JAHG-USA Web Site Subscribe to our newsletter    Home B'ezras Hashem

Newsletter of Judaic Theocracy

Week of 25 Nissan, 5766 / April 23, 2006

Editor: Boruch (Bryan) Ellison

"…Do not imagine to yourself that you will be spared [by being] in the King's house more than all the other Jews. For if you will indeed be silent now, relief and rescue will rise up for the Jews from elsewhere, while you and the house of your father will be wiped out…".

Mordechai speaking to Esther, when she hesitated to risk her life in saving the Jews from their enemies (Esther 4:13-14).

(Just imagine what Mordechai would be saying today to those who don't participate in the PLO-defunding campaign to save lives, not out of fear of death, but simply for the sake of social acceptance and/or convenience!)

"Issues of World War III" Survey

"Should Congress approve nuclear technology aid to India?" Although this proposed assistance is hotly controversial in Congress, it seems not to catch much attention among our readers; responses were down, and there weren't even any significant comments (or perhaps Passover occupied people's attention instead!). Everyone who did respond opposed giving nuclear aid to India, most out of a general unwillingness to encourage nuclear proliferation and the remainder out of a distrust of India as an ally of America.

Factual Background:
The whole of India — including the modern nations of Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Burma/Myanmar — was until shortly after World War II a colonial possession of the British empire. Precisely through such colonialism did European countries spread superior values of higher civilization to much of the primitive, impoverished "Third World." Stopping this positive influence topped the agenda of Amaleki revolutionary forces, followed by their strategic aim of breaking up the world's leading powers. Both objectives were designed to prepare the way for revolution and social demolition, both in the primitive colonies and in the industrial nations weakened by the disengagement.

Starting early in the twentieth century, the forces of Amalek targeted British control over the Indian subcontinent. The Soviet Union and the Comintern (Communist International), the international umbrella organization of Communist parties and movements worldwide, penetrated Indian society and soon established several Communist and Communist-front parties. Prominent among the Communist agents were Motilal and Jawaharlal Nehru (who publicly demonstrated their utter servility to Moscow's control), Mahatma Gandhi (who previously had worked with the South African Communist Party in organizing its network), and Subhas Chandra Bose (later to lead an abortive invasion of Burma during World War II).

The Communists and their collaborators built a network of political parties, subversive organizations, terrorist groups, and nationalist movements. Their support came not only from the Soviet Union, but from the Communist Parties of England, France, Germany, China, and elsewhere, as well as from the British Labour Party, the Fabian Socialists and their parent Milner Group (and their parent Theosophy movement, a literally Satanic and anti-Semitic secret society pulling the strings behind much of the revolution worldwide), and an assortment of Socialist movements internationally.

So by the time infiltrators in the British government had instigated the withdrawal from India in 1947, the Communists and their allies were well-positioned to fill the power vacuum and create chaos. Immediately upon British evacuation, India split into Pakistan and what is now known as India, sparking a destructive war between the two nations. Although the Communists did not succeed at seizing full power and turning India into an actual Communist nation, they have ever since exercised the upper hand in Indian politics. Their control has remained so strong that the Soviets have regularly used India as a proxy for supporting Marxist revolutionaries throughout Asia. Soviet weapons and logistical support funneled through India brought Communists to power in East Pakistan in 1970, separating that nation from Pakistan and creating the miserable, oppressed country of Bangladesh (which is so fully Communist that Soviet Russia is arming them with the latest military aircraft). Soviet aid has also made its way through Indian hands to the Communist, terrorist Tamil Tigers of Elam in Sri Lanka, and the Indian army, heavily equipped with Soviet aircraft, tanks and artillery, and other weapons, has directly invaded Sri Lanka in support of the Communist revolution there.

Thus the arming of India with nuclear technology is a leading Soviet goal. By having the United States foot the bill, the Soviet Communists can not only save considerable money, they can gain access to the latest, most advanced American technology that is vastly superior to the backward Soviet capabilities. Any nuclear aid to India will likely end up in Soviet Russia, Red China, North Korea, and other Communist nations around the world.

Relevant Torah Principles:
1) Torah Law forbids Jews from selling out their fellow Jews to their enemies. One who does so is called a moser (literally, an "informant"), and such a person is subject to immediate death penalty without even a court reaching an official verdict.

2) Under the Noahide commandment of securing justice, betrayal and treason (defined as giving aid and comfort to a nation's enemies) must also be prohibited on pain of death. This includes any logistical assistance to the enemy.

While President Bush makes loud noises about the Soviet nuclear program in Iran (while carefully minimizing the attention on the Soviets, of course), he actively promotes nuclear assistance to the pro-Soviet government in India. Congress has good reason to distrust Bush's plans, and thus his proposed nuclear aid to India faces considerable opposition.

Not only must Congress block the proposed aid, it must cut off all other assistance to the Indian government. And given the subversive threat Indian rulers pose to the entirety of southern Asia, it may well be appropriate to weigh military action to overthrow the Indian government and restore positive colonial influence in the region.

And now for this week's survey question:

Hunting and fishing groups are now leading proponents of conservation of open lands. Should natural preserves be maintained for recreational purposes?

(1) Yes, hunting and fishing of wildlife is an American tradition.
(2) Nature conservance is important, but not for hunting.
(3) No, neither hunting nor anything else is justification for locking up valuable land.
(4) Other

Only one answer per e-mail address will be accepted; only e-mail addresses on our subscription list are eligible. Please send your input by Tuesday, May 2nd, 2006, 12pm PST.

Subversion Alert

This week:
Rabbi Yehuda Edri, Jerusalem, Israel

Rabbi Edri is one of the more prominently advertised members of the phony "Sanhedrin" now trying to take over the Noahide campaign. Like Chaim Richman and Yisrael Ariel (members of the Temple Institute and of the "Sanhedrin" who were profiled in earlier issues), he is a leader in the movement to rebuild the Jerusalem Temple now, while Jewish Law prohibits it. As a head of the Movement to Establish the Temple, Edri has long been a close affiliate of the Temple Institute, itself a close ally of the subversive Root & Branch Association (R & B), the not-so-hidden force behind the Moscow-controlled "Sanhedrin."

Richman, Ariel, and Edri, and their organizations, openly and brazenly defy Jewish Law in (1) advocating the immediate building of the Temple (which cannot be done until after the Messiah is officially empowered and he annihilates the remnants of the Amaleki/Communist enemy), (2) advocating, and actually trying to carry out, the entry of Jews into the Temple Mount area in Jerusalem (defiantly ignoring specific Biblical commandments against ritually impure Jews entering that area except to rebuild the Temple, which isn't yet happening and couldn't happen now anyway), and (3) constructing Temple items, such as the menorah, the altars, and the showbread table (in direct violation of a prohibition on doing so except as authorized for actual Temple construction — a rule the Temple Institute circumvents by brazenly claiming they are building them for literal use in the Temple, which, as already mentioned, doesn't apply now). Not only do these provocateurs mislead Jews into violating Jewish Law, they sow the seeds of confusion deliberately to distract people away from the task of fighting the Amaleki enemy.

The Temple Institute openly admits receiving funding from the same Israeli government that is now dismantling Israel and forcing the nation to surrender to the PLO, and the Institute's founder, Yisrael Ariel, was an Israeli military paratrooper in the 1960s — one of the most common sources for recruiting new agents into Israel's intelligence (the Mossad), which is known to have been heavily penetrated by Soviet agents and which actively works, through its hidden agents, to sabotage all opposition to the PLO. Thus Yehuda Edri himself is a prime candidate to be suspected of secretly working for the Mossad. Not only does Edri work closely with Ariel's Institute, he himself previously worked in the Shas Party, which is under the influence of Rabbi Ovadiah Yosef, the "orthodox" rabbi so notorious for supporting surrender to the PLO that the Lubavitcher Rebbe reputedly refused to meet with him. Ovadiah Yosef was also involved, though more discreetly, in helping to establish the phony "Sanhedrin" a couple of years ago.

So Edri and his allies on the Moscow-controlled "Sanhedrin" are connected openly with the Communist-front Root & Branch and the pro-Communist Ovadiah Yosef, and may be working for Soviet-infiltrated Israeli intelligence. Thus their work in creating the illusion of a new "Sanhedrin" (which quietly serves the Communist enemy while betraying Jewish interests) is in keeping with their history of sabotaging Judaism and Israeli security. With members like Edri, it is small wonder that the "Sanhedrin" refuses even to oppose the Israeli surrender to the PLO, much less U.S. funding for PLO terrorism.

(Note: The underground Communist apparatus and its aboveground tentacles are actively engaged in subversion in all sectors and institutions of society today. Its agents would dearly love to know the full extent of our information, which would assist their disinformation efforts. Consequently, we do not divulge all our facts or sources. These profiles are intended only as a warning to the wise to monitor the individuals and groups exposed here, and to avoid their influence.)

Have Some Chabad Shluchim Betrayed Their Rebbe?

This week's example:
Rabbi Fishel Jacobs, Chabad of Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Rabbi Jacobs was presented our PLO-defunding Proclamation last July 24th, but he nervously declined to sign. His excuse? He said he was currently serving as a chaplain for the Israeli police, and therefore couldn't get involved. Apparently his implicated was that fulfilling his responsibility as an Israeli, a Jew, and a human being to save lives would somehow be a conflict of interest. Needless to say, this kind of cowardice was very rare until just a few years ago. Shame on Rabbi Jacobs!

Terrorism Update:

The Soviet Russians and Red Chinese continue to escalate the PLO war against Israel, with U.S. funding. Here's a review of terror attacks over the last 3 weeks, since our last issue:

April 5th through 18th (including Passover): At least 18 Kassam rockets fired by the PLO's Palestinian Authority (PA), the al-Aqsa Brigades of the PLO's Fatah group, and their close ally, Islamic Jihad (1 exploded in a crowded dining hall on the Sabbath, 1 started a fire in a factory, & others damaged greenhouses and farm equipment); terrorists of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP, a leading PLO member group that is overtly Marxist-Leninist) and the Islamic Jihad threw bombs and fired guns at Israeli soldiers, injuring 1; 2 arrested for planning a suicide bombing; 2 members of the PLO's al-Aqsa Brigades were killed by Israeli forces before they could conduct a terror strike (they had Soviet rifles, bullets, hand grenades, & other equipment for an attack); 2 others arrested carrying several bombs; 3 caught throwing rocks at Israeli cars driving on the road; firebombs and bombs thrown at Israeli soldiers, at least 1 firebomb thrown at an Israeli army vehicle, and at least 6 firebomb attacks at cars on the road; 1 attempted bombing of an Israeli army vehicle failed; at least 5 arrested carrying knives & planning attacks, and another with an axe and a gun; rocks thrown at Israeli soldiers on several occasions, against a tourist bus (injuring 1), & at a Jewish community; terrorists murdered an Arab man for selling his apartment building to Jews (he was gunned down in his car, which was then burned); pro-PLO Arabs and Israeli Communists rioted, throwing rocks at Israeli soldiers; gunfire aimed at Israeli soldiers; during Passover week, the al-Aqsa Brigades of the PLO's Fatah & their ally, Islamic Jihad, carried out a suicide bombing at a Tel Aviv restaurant, killing 9 & injuring 66 (including at least 1 American teenager); PLO-instigated rioters threw rocks & firebombs at Israeli soldiers.

The 3-week casualty count (not counting dead & injured terrorists):

News reports surfaced that "Al Qaeda" was penetrating the Gaza Strip and organizing future terrorist attacks — but then it turned out that the source of the "news" was none other than Mahmoud Abbas, Soviet Russia's man in charge of the PLO (and some Arabic paper claiming sources in Jordanian intelligence, itself heavily penetrated by Soviet agents)!

That bogus "Al Qaeda" story, meant to deflect attention from the PLO, was followed by another claim that "Al Qaeda" was behind Monday's bombing in the Sinai town of Dahab. But the source was — yes, that's right, the secret police agency of Communist Egypt, organized and trained by Soviet Russia!

The PLO and its Soviet sponsors are busy these days trying to draw attention away from the PLO terror network (which is coordinated and sponsored by the Soviet KGB/FSB secret police), using the PLO-funded Hamas, the Soviet-supported regime in Iran, and even the non-existent "Al Qaeda" as smokescreens for the Soviet-PLO network. The main point, of course, is that they don't want anyone thinking too hard about the massive U.S. funding of the PLO, which continues today as the main support for its terrorism.

(Sources: various Israeli and American news agencies)

Some Chabad Shluchim Are Helping the JAHG-USA Campaign

This week's examples:
Rabbi Yaakov Lazaros, Chabad House, Framingham, MA;
Rabbi Beryl Epstein, Hassidic Discovery Center, Brooklyn, NY; and
Rabbi Mendel Lerman, Oholei Torah Yeshiva, Brooklyn, NY

Rabbi Lazaros was shown the PLO-defunding Proclamation last July 17th, and he signed without hesitation. Unlike Rabbi Jacobs (see above), Rabbi Lazaros didn't try to invent some excuse to bow out, and he realized with perfect clarity that there is no conflict between being a Chabad representative and fulfilling the obligation to save lives from terrorism.

Rabbi Epstein was presented the Proclamation the next day, July 18th, and also signed on the spot. He is the founder and director of a unique and innovative program for introducing non-Hasidic Jews and gentiles to Hasidic community life.

Rabbi Lerman also saw and endorsed the PLO-defunding Proclamation that same day. As an administrator at one of the major Lubavitch school systems, he joins a number of teachers and principals at the same yeshiva in endorsing the campaign to stop U.S. financing of the PLO.

We need more volunteers to approach rabbis for endorsements of the PLO-defunding campaign. Whether your rabbi is Chabad, Littvoch ("misnagged"), modern orthodox, Sefardi, or with some other Hasidic movement, and regardless of what country he is in, you need to get his signature. E-mail us at newsletter@noahide.com for copies of the Proclamation and for information on how to approach your rabbi.

For a complete listing of all rabbis who have received our proclamation, the up-to-date status of their responses, and how you can get help the campaign, visit ATTAC Report at http://www.attacreport.com/plo/.

This Week on ATTAC Report

This week's edition of our sister site, ATTAC Report, presents:

Letters to the Editor

NOTE: The stream of letters continues to flow in, so we'll have to print and/or answer them over the next few issues of the newsletter. Here's part two of the responses to the article on the subversion of art:

(In response to our exposé of "Lubavitch" rap/Reggae/hip-hop "musician" Matisyahu in our last issue):
"I look forward to receiving and reading the newsletters… Always much to glean from you folks; for example, the Matisyahu expose this issue was very informative and well articulated the uneasiness I've felt about him." — GRP.

(In response to our March 26th issue, where we stated that "In music, Mozart dabbled in the Gnostic propaganda of Freemasonry with his Magic Flute; Beethoven championed anarchist revolution, especially in his 9th symphony…"):
"…you make a statement of condemnation by writing [as above]… [you make] blind, unthoughtful, misleading statements." — BB.

"…I'd be interested in knowing where Gnostic propaganda and the promotion of anarchist revolution appear in Magic Flute/the 9th symphony." — RZ.

Our response: Having covered Mozart in our last issue, we now turn to Beethoven.

Subversive influence was not limited to Ludwig van Beethoven's 9th and final symphony; it was, rather, an integral part of his entire musical career. While it remains unclear whether he was an actual member of the Freemasons or any other such subversive organization (he has been suspected of Masonic sympathies), Beethoven was filled with a burning hatred of traditional society and a furious desire for anarchist revolution. He openly and effusively admired the French revolution, was unfazed by its bloody Reign of Terror and mass murder of over a hundred thousand peasants, and frankly adored the revolution's product, Napoleon Bonaparte — whom the Alter Rebbe, founder of the Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidic movement, described as "the Satan" and whom he devoted his life (and the lives of his top Hasidim) to destroy. In honor of that same evil Napoleon, Beethoven wrote and dedicated his 3rd symphony. That is, until Beethoven decided that his idol had lost some of his revolutionary fervor, at which time Beethoven scratched Napoleon's name off the symphony and condemned his former hero — not for being revolutionary, but rather for not being revolutionary enough!

Each of Beethoven's subsequent symphonies increased in revolutionary anger. Friedrich Schiller, another unabashed admirer of the French Revolution and its destruction, was another of Beethoven's heroes; at least eight years before writing his first symphony, Beethoven conceived of creating a musical accompaniment to Schiller's "Ode to Joy," a subversive product of, and promoter of, the atheistic and revolutionary values of the Enlightenment. Beethoven's 9th symphony fulfilled that desire; its first three movements express the struggle of revolution against social norms, and the fourth movement, incorporating the choral version of Schiller's poem, passionately yearns for a utopian uprising of the masses.

The 9th symphony appropriately inspired Richard Wagner, the dedicated Socialist revolutionary who destroyed music itself through disharmony and who, in turn, inspired the National Socialists of the Hitler regime. It is for good reason that the Communists, who everywhere and always hate all culture that they cannot use for revolutionary destruction, have singled out Beethoven as literally their favorite, most revolutionary composer. From Soviet dictator Nikolai Lenin (that paragon of utter hatred who nonetheless called Beethoven "a human genius") to other top Soviet officials (A.V. Lunacharskii, Lenin's Commissar of Education and arch-enemy of the Jewish people, stated that "all music is adopted to be the language of the revolution," to be "organized for struggle," and that the most perfect tool for that "struggle" was Beethoven) to modern Marxists have not only praised but actively promoted Beethoven's music — especially, of course, his 9th symphony.

Beethoven himself was well known to the authorities for his revolutionary sympathies. After the fall of Napoleon, the Austrian police actively monitored Beethoven's frequent anarchist, anti-religious, bitter diatribes, which continued until his death.

Having said all that, I might add that I personally listen to Beethoven's music and consider it to be among the best ever composed. This is based on the principle, mentioned a couple of issues back, that some types of music and other art can be rescued, so to speak, from their corrupt or evil origins. A number of Hasidic songs, considered particularly holy music, originated among pagan or revolutionary gentiles as songs of drunken revelry, barbaric crudeness, or even Amaleki revolution. But where the music's meaning may also fit holier themes, it can be re-used with the new intent. Beethoven's music was not ruined in the manner of Wagner's, but merely expresses powerful passions. That zeal, even in the 9th symphony, can be re-interpreted from anarchism and revolution into a Messianic longing for victory over Amalek — as an expression of anti-Communist uprising, for example. The main point is that a person must actively construe the music in a different way than meant by Beethoven, or else it can be as destructive as ever.

(Next issue: Answering a general objection to the philosophical values behind our viewpoint on art — with a refutation of myths about King David.)

Send your letter to the editor to newsletter@noahide.com.

Be sure to visit our Web site, Noahide.com.

You have received this mailing because your e-mail address was submitted to us to receive news updates and other information by e-mail. If you no longer want to receive this critical information, send an e-mail message saying so to [address withheld].

Return to newsletter archive