JAHG-USA Web Site Subscribe to our newsletter    Home B'ezras Hashem

JAHG-USA Newsletter
Week of 24 Kislev, 5766 / December 25, 2005

Editor: Boruch (Bryan) Ellison


Correction: In last week's issue, I referred to "the Entente surrender" at the end of WWI. Actually, the Triple Entente were the victorious allies, and those that surrendered were known as the "Central Powers." Thus the phrase should have read "the surrender of the Central Powers."

"Issues of World War III" Survey

"Should the death penalty be used?" Our responding readers were once again unanimous, this time in full support of expanded capital punishment. That shouldn't be too surprising, given the well-known Torah requirement for it, although the specifics may be a bit different than even most Hasidic Gentiles or observant Jews think. Here are a few excerpted comments:

Factual Background:
The recent noise against capital punishment was generated by a small but vocal minority in defense of convicted murderer Stanley Tookie Williams. Williams, for the record, was a founder of the Crips network of gangs which, as we have previously reviewed, was created by the Revolutionary Action Movement (RAM), the Black Panther Party (BPP), and other Cuban-controlled Marxist revolutionary organizations, all of which tried to organize urban guerrilla warfare to burn down the cities of the United States. The Crips have functioned as the drug-pushing, fundraising arm of the revolution, and have maintained their close working alliance with overtly Marxist terrorist groups.

Presumably Williams himself was a member of the Communist underground; certainly, in recent years he worked openly for the uniting of all gangs in revolution, toeing exactly the Marxist agenda. Prison officials also have mentioned information that he had continued to run the Crips gangs from within prison, enforcing a violent, ugly regime of terror throughout gangland territory in American cities. It is no wonder his supporters have included some of the most notorious radicals. For example:

Such supporters of Williams clearly oppose capital punishment only against Communists and their allies, but have no great difficulty with Communist genocide that has already exterminated hundreds of millions of innocent human beings globally, nor with the Communist-run network of hundreds of terrorist groups around the world that are murdering civilians every single day. If these Marxists would have their way in keeping their revolutionary comrades alive long enough to overthrow the U.S. government and come to power, one can only guess how many tens of millions of Americans they would then gleefully annihilate in new concentration camps (R"L). It isn't the death penalty they oppose; it's only the execution of Communists that displeases them.

But there is also the larger, more general issue of capital punishment.

Relevant Torah Principles:
1) The basic halacha (religious law) of the Noahide Laws provides only a single punishment for any proven violation of any of the fundamental provisions of the Seven Commandments: death by sword, meaning decapitation (Rambam, Mishneh Torah, Laws of Kings 9:14). Any sin for which there is no capital punishment has no prescribed penalty at all. The capital offenses include any act of worshipping an idol or false god (including Buddha, Jesus, etc.), the act of blaspheming G-d verbally (according to a certain formulation of words), any act of direct or indirect (but willful) murder (including abortion), any theft (even of a paper clip, or an act of cheating, etc.), any forbidden relations (male homosexuality, adultery with a married woman, etc.), eating a limb torn from a living land animal (foul are not necessarily included), or various actions against law and order (presumably including treason, etc.; there is some dispute as to the exact provisions of this commandment).

2) Under the Noahide Laws, the government may (and often must) institute additional prohibitions or requirements, and may establish a variety of other penalties for their violation (including death penalty, if necessary). But for the basic rules of the Torah, only death penalty by decapitation is permitted.

3) When there is at least one reliable witness to the sin, with no contrary testimony by reliable eyewitnesses or clear forensic evidence opposing the witness(es), the courts must execute the offender (the witness could be the defendant himself, that is, his confession is accepted as proof). The judges are not free to evade the punishment for any reason; the testimony settles the matter, and the rest is in G-d's hands. But if the case rests entirely on forensic evidence without any direct eyewitness testimony, it may be that the court is not allowed to enforce the death penalty.

4) The Torah also requires rapid justice. The defendant must be tried immediately, not weeks or months later; the evidence (eyewitness testimony) is either there, or it is not. The trial should not be more than a couple of days, and the execution (or the defendant's release) take place on the very same day as the conviction itself. Jewish law, and thus perhaps Noahide law, does provide for appeals, but they can only take place during the short period between conviction and execution — that is to say, within the hour (or so).

Analysis:
We have not delved into the Stanley Williams case to learn whether he was convicted using eyewitness testimony or merely forensic evidence. If Williams were merely an ordinary criminal, this distinction might be extremely important. Absent eyewitness testimony, the Torah may very well rule that not only would he not receive the death penalty, but would actually have to be released. On the other hand, if there is eyewitness testimony that the Torah rules to be reliable, the courts would have no choice but to execute him (the method of lethal injection would, apparently, not be acceptable; only decapitation is allowed).

But since Williams is a member of a global criminal conspiracy for total revolution, anarchy, and mass murder — that is, the Communist International — the minimal rules of Torah no longer apply. In such a case, the obligations of justice require the government to institute special laws and measures for the total suppression of Communist revolution (a principle known in Torah as "the king's justice"); these measures can, and must, include the acceptance of lower standards of evidence (forensic or circumstantial evidence, for example) for conviction, because of the emergency. Without question, the government is obligated to pass all necessary laws and carry out all required punishments to fight the Communist revolution. The Communists have long ago declared war on all civilization, and all society must unite to stamp out the threat entirely. Revolutionaries such as Williams and his allies simply will not stop their unceasing war for evil until they are dead, and thus we have no option but to eliminate them.

And now for this week's survey question:
The production of opium and related drugs in Afghanistan is increasing, and those drugs are headed for Europe and America. What should the U.S. do about the Afghan drug industry?

(1) Eradicate the poppy fields aggressively.
(2) Limit poppy cultivation, but only in coordination with the Afghan government.
(3) Don't do anything which might risk alienating Afghan people and driving them into the Taliban revolution.
(4) Other

Only one answer per e-mail address will be accepted; only e-mail addresses on our subscription list are eligible. Please send your input by Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 12pm PST.


THE HALL OF SHAME…
Have Some Chabad Shluchim Betrayed Their Rebbe?

This week's example:
Rabbi Kasriel Kastel, Lubavitch Youth Organization, Brooklyn, NY

A JAHG-USA volunteer showed Rabbi Kastel our Proclamation (declaring the Torah duty for everyone to help defund the PLO) on April 5. At the rabbi's request, the volunteer returned three days later to get his response, but found him to have become most evasive. Rabbi Kastel spent a fair amount of time discussing the Proclamation without clearly hinting whether he planned to sign it, then claimed he had no time to discuss it when pressed for a signature. Our volunteer didn't let him get away so easily, but soon the rabbi was again trying to postpone the decision, becoming yet more evasive, etc. It became painfully obvious he just didn't want to sign, but also didn't want to be publicly identified as not signing.

It's just another case of wanting to stay out of controversy by taking no side at all. At that point, only one rabbi had signed the Proclamation, so perhaps it's understandable that Rabbi Kastel thought he might be sticking out his neck for something that might not be popular. But he shouldn't have to wait until hundreds of his colleagues have endorsed (as is now the case) before he reconsiders. The Torah is clear: Every Jew is obligated to do whatever he can to save lives, regardless of what others think or do.

Terrorism Update:
Here are some more PLO terror attacks funded by the U.S. taxpayer that were conducted or attempted this last week:
  • Islamic Jihad units fired several Kassam rockets from the Gaza Strip into other parts of Israel, wounding five soldiers and nearly damaging a power plant through the explosions. Islamic Jihad is controlled and backed by the Communist regimes of Egypt, Syria, and Iran, and coordinates its attacks closely with Fatah, the main group of the PLO.
    (Note: Interestingly, Arutz-Sheva often doesn't identify the specific PLO-affiliated group behind these attacks, whereas other sources may do so; Arutz-Sheva constantly likes to refer to the terrorists merely as "Arabs," implying that Arabs in general are fighting Israel, rather than the Communists fighting Israel and the Arabs both. This is the Communist and PLO propaganda line in Jewish disguise. In truth, Arabs themselves are equally the victims of PLO terror and are paralyzed — with guns to their heads, quite literally — from doing anything to stop it. Again, we are reminded of the well-founded suspicion that Arutz-Sheva has long been infiltrated by Israeli intelligence agencies, which are working to neutralize opposition to Israel's surrender to the PLO — in this example, by redirecting Jewish backlash away from the Communist enemy toward Arab victims. Arutz-Sheva outwardly maintains a "right-wing" image, but the wise will not rely on it as an authentic voice for patriotic Israelis.)
  • Members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), one of the more openly Marxist groups in the PLO, fired guns at Israeli soldiers while being pursued for arrest. The PFLP fugitives had been involved in organizing earlier suicide attacks.
  • A member of Hamas, a group funded by the PLO (but technically not part of the organization), also fired at soldiers but was killed himself.
  • Firebombs and stones were thrown at Israeli cars.
  • A group of PLO protesters threw stones at Israeli soldiers.
  • PLO gangs kidnapped an Australian and a Dutch person who were visiting the Gaza Strip. Recently, British visitors have also been abducted.
  • The Islamic Jihad threatened to accelerate rocket attacks. The PLO-coordinated Palestinian Resistance Committee declared it now possesses longer-range missiles, as well as security-restricted maps of nearby Israeli military bases (presumably obtained through spies). And the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, a division of the PLO's own Fatah organization, boasts a new, even longer-range Grad missile that could strike targets 15 miles outside the Gaza Strip. In other words, all PLO-affiliated groups are openly threatening an escalation of terrorism.

The hundreds of millions of American taxpayer dollars going to the PLO and its "Palestinian Authority" (and other affiliated front organizations) are paying for the organizing of terror, the training of the terrorists, and the acquisition of missiles, bombs, guns, and munitions. The only way to undermine the terror and turn the tide is by cutting off the U.S. financing of the PLO. Congress is at least partly interested in the idea, which is supported by the vast majority of Americans but opposed by President Bush. With some more political pressure, Congress can pull together enough votes to override Bush and end the funding of terror.

(Sources: various Israeli and American news agencies)


…AND THE HALL OF FAME
Some Chabad Shluchim Are Helping the JAHG-USA Campaign

This week's example:
Dr. Dovid Sholom Pape, Tzivos Hashem, Brooklyn, NY

Dr. Pape was shown a copy of the Proclamation on June 8th. After reading it and asking a bit about it, he signed on the spot.

Like Rabbi Kastel, Dr. Pape is a respected leader in a well-established Chabad organization for outreach to Jewish youth (Rabbi Kastel's Lubavitch Youth Organization was founded in the 1950s, while Tzivos Hashem was established in 1980). Yet Dr. Pape showed much greater leadership in fighting terrorism. His name is widely recognized and respected in the Lubavitch movement, and his endorsement has already helped bring other backers on board. If Dr. Pape doesn't fear losses from endorsing the JAHG-USA campaign to defund the PLO, Rabbi Kastel shouldn't, either. But when it comes to image considerations, there's no accounting for logic.

What do you think about Jewish leadership on PLO defunding? Send us your comments at newsletter@noahide.com.

For a complete listing of all rabbis who have received our proclamation, the up-to-date status of their responses, and how you can get help the campaign, visit ATTAC Report at http://www.attacreport.com/plo/.


Letters to the Editor

"There is a fellow whose last name is Stone who is running a web site claiming Bnai Noah and Chabad support but attacking the new Sanhedrin… do you know if this is a plot like Root and Branch?" — MSA.

Our response: There's a big plot here, but it isn't merely like the Root and Branch Association (R & B); it's a literal part of that subversive network. Further, it's not to attack the "Sanhedrin," but to promote it. And "John Stone" is part of the plot.

The strategy of trying to destroy Judaism by co-opting the rabbis is nothing new. In the early 1800s, French dictator Napoleon — described by the Alter Rebbe (founder of the Chabad movement and author of the Tanya) as "the Satan" and the ultimate, most evil enemy of the Jewish people — convened a phony "Sanhedrin" of Jewish leaders to rubber-stamp his rewriting of Torah Law. Ultimately, Napoleon's scheme had little impact, so his Communist successors later infiltrated Judaism to create the Reform and "Conservative" cults that still mislead millions of Jews to this day and which are not part of Judaism in any way.

The Amaleki enemy has been trying for many years now to pre-empt or co-opt any incipient "Noahide" movement, that is, to prevent authentic Jewish influence from reaching the masses of non-Jews. A vast network of subversive individuals and groups has grown up since the 1980s to infiltrate and lead astray any potential Hasidic Gentiles; the hub of this movement is the New York-based Root and Branch Association, which, like a chameleon, frequently changes its coloration to counteract exposures of its insidious activities against Judaism (in the name of Judaism and Torah, of course!).

Having been repeatedly frustrated in their attempts to seize control of Hasidic Gentiles in recent years, they have now adopted Napoleon's old tactic of establishing a phony "Sanhedrin" to exert "authority" and control from above. But this is nothing more than the apostasy and subversion by spies as prophesied in the rabbinical traditions of the Talmud.

The new "Sanhedrin," formed last year, is understandably cagey about naming its members, but the few names we do know, plus its endorsers, are enough to expose its true nature:

The one notable "detractor" is the mysterious person who calls himself "John Stone" and runs a "Noahide" web site. "Stone" was previously an open endorser of Root and Branch, but when we began publicly exposing the network, "Stone" suddenly pretended to turn against them as well. He has tried multiple times since then to gain our confidence and sympathy. He has created a tiny, obscure, nearly unreadable web page criticizing the new "Sanhedrin," but not for any clear reason; the page is simply provocative bait intended to lure those who might suspect the "Sanhedrin" of being unkosher, and to try to discredit such opposition. "Stone" (or whatever his real name might be) may well be a CIA provocateur.

There is much more, but one gets the general idea. The point is that the "Sanhedrin" is nothing more than a front for Communist intelligence agencies, which themselves are able to use the intelligence services of America (the CIA), Israel (Mossad, Shin Bet, etc.), and other Western countries as "false flag" covers for its operations, harnessing the innumerable KGB agents in those other services. They also have, of course, the entire underground Communist apparatus at their disposal. The main purpose of the "Sanhedrin" is undoubtedly to control the Hasidic Gentile movement — an objective they will never fully achieve.

The true Sanhedrin, when it really does come back to life (in the very near future), must — and will — first and foremost carry out its Torah obligation to name a great, righteous leader as Moshiach (the Messiah), who must then lead the Jews to victory in World War III (the third War of Gog and Magog). In practical terms, this means the King Moshiach will fight and defeat the entire Communist Bloc, annihilating Marxist revolution forever (and rooting out Jewish traitors, such as the leaders of the phony "Sanhedrin"). This sequence — first naming the king, then waging war and defeating the forces of Amalek, and then (and only then) rebuilding the Jerusalem Temple — is the requirement of Jewish Law (Rambam, Mishneh Torah, Laws of Kings 1:1-2).

But don't expect the phony "Sanhedrin" to select a Jewish king who will genuinely fight international Communism.


Send your letter to the editor to newsletter@noahide.com.

Be sure to visit our Web site, Noahide.com.


You have received this mailing because your e-mail address was submitted to us to receive news updates and other information by e-mail. If you no longer want to receive this critical information, send an e-mail message saying so to [address withheld].

Return to newsletter archive